Microwave Harassment and
Mind-Control Experimentation
by, Julianne McKinney Director
Electronic Surveillance Project Association of National Security Alumni
December 1992
NOTICE: Please Read!
Whither the KGB?
In February 1974, Georgetown University's Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) hosted discussions on the plight of dissenters in
the Soviet Union, and on a means by which the U.S. Government might most
effectively intervene. highlights of these discussions are reported in "Understanding
the Solzhenitsyn Affair: Dissent and its Control in the USSR," (CSIS,
1974).
KGB strategies were addressed in some detail during these discussions. It was
noted that the KGB's success depended on the extensive use of informant
networks and agent provocateurs; and, following Brezhnev's rise to power, on
the use of drugs and psychiatrists for further purpose of manipulation and
control. Shadowing, bugging, slandering, blacklisting and other related tactics
were also cited as serving KGB purpose. Participants in the conference agreed
that the KGB's obvious intent was to divide and isolate the populace, to spread
fear, and to silent dissenters.
Agencies of our own government are on record as having employed precisely these
same tactics on a recurrent basis. The Church and Rockefeller Committee
Hearings in the mid-70's purportedly put an end to these practices. Based on
recent developments, it would appear that the CIA's and FBI's Operations
MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO (the focus of these Senate Committee and
Vice-President- level Hearings) were instead merely driven underground. We are
now in contact with a total of 25 individuals, scattered throughout the United
states, who firmly believe they are being harassed by agencies of the U.S.
Government. Others have been brought to our attention whom we will be
contacting in the future. The majority of these individuals claim that their
harassment and surveillance began in 1989.
The methods reportedly employed in these harassment campaigns bear a striking
resemblance to those attributed to the CIA and FBI during Operations MKULTRA,
MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The only difference now is that electronic harassment
and experimentation also appear to be (more blatantly) involved.
The Berlin Wall is down, Communism is in the midst of a death rattle, and the
KGB no longer poses the threat which purportedly served to justify the U.S.
Government's resort to such operations as MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO. The
KGB, since 1989, has been reduced to an increasingly distant memory.
Reactivation of surveillance/harassment/mind-control operations in this country
suggest that the KGB, as an institution, was never the real threat. A KGB
"mentality," which is underlying pragmatic contempt for civil
liberties, appears, instead, to have been the driving force behind MKULTRA,
MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, and the operations now being reported to us.
The KGB "mentality" is a matter of personal predilection, not
ideology. Its objective is power and control, regardless of human cost. It is a
corrupting, cancerous influence, which feeds on fear, conformity and government
funding.
Four months ago, when this Project commenced, we approached these complaints of
government harassment and experimentation with an admitted "high degree of
caution." We are no longer skeptical. The growing numbers of independent
complaints and the similarities between those complaints cannot be ignored.
Under the circumstances, the KGB should be proud of itself. As a
"mentality," the KGB appears to be accomplishing more in
"burying this country" from within, than it could ever have hoped to
have achieved as an institution. It would appear that this country has a
serious problem on its hands which needs to be resolved.
Part I of this report, which is reprinted from the June-July edition of the
association's publication, Unclassified, preliminarily addresses the complaints
brought to our attention as of July 1992. Our objective, as noted, was to weigh
the legitimacy of those complaints in terms of the directed-energy technologies
reportedly involved. Part II discusses the overt and covert patterns of
harassment identified as a result of our investigations, to date. A part of our
objective, here, is to limit the success of such operations in the future, by
according them widespread publicity.
In Part II, we do not identify individuals by name, both to honor their privacy
and because our investigations have not been completed. Part II, like Part I,
is a preliminary finding. Our focus is on the similarities of the complaints
being received -- similarities which Federal and State legislators, the courts,
the FBI, local law enforcement agencies, the medical and psychiatric
professions, and organizations such as the ACLU and Amnesty International have
so far chosen to ignore.
We frankly find it curious that more attention and creditability is being
accorded purported victims of UFO experiences and spectral visitations, than to
persons who complain of systematic harassment and experimentation by the U.S.
Government, involving technologies which the U.S. Government is only now
grudgingly admitting to possess. These complaints require investigation. In due
course
(and provided financial support is obtained), we hope to be able to acquire the
technology and supportive medical expertise to substantiate the claims being
made. We also hope to alter the institutional mindset that U.S. Intelligence
can be trusted. History, repeatedly, has proven otherwise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 1 - THE PROBLEM SURFACES [Reprinted from the June-July 1992 edition of
UNCLASSIFIED (Vol. IV, No. 3), published by The Association of National
Security Alumni, Washington, D.C.]
The August-September 1991 issue of UNCLASSIFIED reviewed Hamline University's
"Public Administration" report on the resolution of MKULTRA cases in
1988. Although the shocking details of medical ethics abuses by the U.S. and
Canadian governments were amply detailed, Washington and Ottawa -- citing national
security and government privilege -- stalled for so long that cases never came
to trial. the surviving victims settled for a pittance in an out- of-court
settlement.
Since no individuals or agencies were held legally accountable, the door was
left open for possible resumption of similar "mind- control"
activities.
In the context of that article, we mentioned briefly that some half-dozen
people had contacted us with appeals for assistance in ending what they believe
to be electronic harassment and mind- control experimentation, possibly
involving the CIA. We decided to take a closer look at the situation.
We are now in touch with approximately a dozen individuals throughout the
United States who appear to be targets of harassment and mind-control
experimentation involving directed-energy technologies. [By mid-November 1992,
the number had increased to 25.]
Typically, persons who complain of being "zapped by radio waves" and
of "hearing voices" are stigmatized as psychotic, delusional or
schizophrenic. Being mindful of this, as well as aware of the treatment
accorded UFO and psychic phenomena "freaks," we approach this subject
with a high degree of caution. Based on our preliminary investigation,
including interviews with the affected individuals, we conclude that the matter
is serious and should be pursued further.
The Existing Directed-Energy Arsenal Our first step was to determine what, if
any technology exists which might be used for electronic harassment. The
information was found in a "white paper" published in 1991 by the
U.S. Global Strategy Council -- a Washington-based organization, under the
chairmanship of Ray Cline, former Deputy Director of the CIA, who maintains
very close ties with the U.S. Intelligence community. The "white paper"
describes the foreign and domestic uses foreseen for laser weapons, isotropic
radiators, infrasound, non-nuclear electromagnetic pulse generators, and
high-powered microwave emitters.
The term, "non-lethal," used to describe this technology is
misleading. the energy emitted from all of these weapons can kill people when
appropriately amplified. At lower levels of amplified, they can cause extreme
forms of physical discomfort and debilitation.
The Department of the Army (DA) identifies these same weapons as "non-conventional."
They were so identified in an exhibit at a DA- sponsored symposium on "The
Soldier As A System," in Crystal City, VA, on June 30, 1992. Beta wave
incapacitators were separately mentioned during the symposium as being particular
interested to the U.S. Marine Corps.
We discussed these "non-conventional" directed-energy weapons with
Mr. Vernon Shisler, manager of the exhibit and the Army's delegate to NATO in
matters pertaining to "The Soldier As A System." Mr. Shisler
acknowledged not only that directed-energy weapons are in the Dod's arsenal,
but also that the American soldier will remain vulnerable to their effects,
should they be employed in the battlefield.
The U.S. Global Strategy Council recognizes the issue of vulnerability, as
well, and urges ongoing research into effective countermeasures.
Interested readers may want to send for the U.S. Global Strategy Council's
complete project proposal on this subject: (Title: Nonlethality: Development of
a National Policy and Employing Nonlethal Means in a New Strategic Era,
prepared by Janet Morris). A number of references in this Proposal to
unidentified, elusive "enemies" of the U.S. Government and the
potential domestic applications of this "non-lethal" technology
invite serious consideration by the public at large.
The Council's address is 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20006, (202) 466-6029.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BIOEFFECTS OF MICROWAVE RADIATION Research into biological and psychological
effects of exposure to microwave radiation is voluminous. The U.S. public has
been led to believe that the former Soviet Union leads in this research. The
fact is, the CIA and DoD [Department of Defense] have jointly pursued precisely
the same research since commencement of Project Pandora in the 1950's. The
current primary users of this research appear to be the CIA, DoD, the National
Security Agency (NSA) and the Department of Energy (DoE).
The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) has participated in this
research since Project Pandora. In 1973, WRAIR discovered that
externally-induced auditory input could be achieved by means of pulsed
microwave audiograms, or analogs of spoken words' sounds. The effect on the
receiving end is the (schizophrenic) sensation of "hearing voices"
which are no part of the recipients' own thought processes.
The experiment prompted the following comment in "The Body Electric:
Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life," by Robert O. Becker, M.D.,
and Gary Selden (Wm. Morrow & Company, NY, 1985): "Such a device has
obvious applications in covert operations designed to drive a target crazy with
'voices' or deliver undetected instructions to a programmed assassin."
This research has continued, and the results are published in various publicly
available scientific and technical journals. Interested readers might consult,
for example: Lin, James C., Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems
(Plenum Press, NY, 1989). Professor Lin, then with the Department of
Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, has published a number of
books and articles on this subject. [He has more recently informed us that he
had designed the experiment referred above in Dr. Becker's book.]
WRAIR has more recently been studying the biological effects of exposure to
high power microwave radiation. WRAIR presented a paper on this subject to a
DoD-sponsored symposium on "MW [microwave] Weapons" at the Naval
Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, in mid-1989.
A matter of interest to us is why WRAIR should be experimenting with auditory
effects of pulsed microwave audiograms. Also, recent statements by an Army
psychiatrist assigned to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) suggest
that WRAIR may be experimenting upon select psychiatric inpatients with
microwaves. This, too, is a matter to us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT The Government's past record of abuses in the area of
civil rights is well documented. Within the past 30 years alone, we have
witnessed the effects of Operations MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO.
Primarily because of MKULTRA, MHCHAOS and COINTELPRO, Executive Orders and
implementing regulations were published which prohibited military and CIA
domestic covert intelligence operations. Experiments on involuntary human
subjects, and the surveillance of/collection of personal information on U.S.
citizens, except under strictly regulated conditions were also prohibited.
Congressional committees were created to oversee compliance with these (quasi-)
legal prohibitions. We have evidence that this is not being done. Moreover,
where there are laws and, in this case, no laws enacted, there are loopholes,
as well as individual and institutions who deliberately capitalize upon the
existence of loopholes. Iran-Contra is one of the more blatant recent examples.
Loopholes are also found in government resort to "black" intelligence
and weapons programs, in the use of contractors, and in the absence of clear
definitions of such terms as "national security" and "national
security risk."
Executive Orders and regulations which currently limit U.S. Intelligence
activities do not extend to non-intelligence government agencies or to their
contractors. If fact, Executive Order 12333 specifies that government
contractors do not need to know that their services support U.S. Intelligence
objectives.
In its report of July 8, 1992, the Senate Subcommittee on Oversight of
Government Management addresses the problem of tracking funds granted to
government-contracted research and development (R&D) centers. The report
notes that the problem is compounded by DoD's penchant for creating
hard-to-monitor "shell" contractors as disbursement centers for
funding programs.
Neither shell contractors nor their subcontractors are directly accountable to
Congress. Being beyond Congressional oversight, they have the license to
operate as Government surrogates in intelligence operations about which,
"officially" they know nothing.
In this context, a publication disseminated at DA's "The Soldier As A
System" symposium noted that the Army's Research and Technology Program
sponsors 42 laboratories and R & D centers, employing approximately 10,000
scientists and engineers. The annual budget of $1.3 billion is only a small
part of overall DoD research spending.
Weapons research, which includes the development and testing of
"non-lethal" weapons, is not governed by laws restricting the
activities of U.S. Intelligence agencies, though it may be presumed that these
agencies contribute to and benefit from such research.
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
1. The technology exists for the types of harassment and experimentation
reported to us.
2. About a dozen U.S. citizens have informed us of continuing experiments with
effects which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce.
3. U.S. Government-sponsored research into the bio-effects of exposure to
microwave radiation is extensive and continuing.
4. The U.S. Government has a past record of having engaged in mind-control
experimentation; and various agencies of the Government have a record of
circumventing legal restrictions upon their activities.
5. Neither Congress nor the courts appear willing to look closely into "black"
intelligence and weapons procurement programs.
6. A number of U.S. Government agencies might have interest in testing
directed-energy technologies on U.S. citizens under non-clinical/non-controlled
circumstances -- DoD, to test ranges and degrees of "non-lethality";
DoE, to explore "safety" limits; CIA, to test
"mind-control" capabilities, and NSA, for technological refinement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART II -- OVERT AND COVERT HARASSMENT Since publication of the preceding
article less than four months ago, the association of National Security
Alumni/Electronic Surveillance Project has heard from an additional 13
individuals who report both overt harassment and a range of symptoms which coincide
with the known effects of exposure to microwaves, electromagnetic/radio
frequency (RF) radiation and/or infrasound.
The similarity of these symptoms will be addressed in greater detail in future
Project reports. Suffice it to say, at this point, that the physical and
psychological symptoms being reported to us are consistent with the effects
which directed-energy weapons are designed to produce. Indeed, the numerous
afflictions (or "inflictions") being reported appear to parallel standard
torture "sequelae,"(1) (aftereffects).
OVERT HARASSMENT -- which obviously is meant to be observed -- may be intended
to "precondition" individuals for eventual long-term electronic
harassment. Persons terrified by unexplained overt harassment are not likely to
cope with the sudden onset of electronic harassment in any more reasoned
fashion. This phased pattern of harassment is apparent in all of the cases now
being investigated. The fact that the overt harassment continues in these cases
even after the electronic targeting commences suggest that the objective is to
maintain long-term extremes of stress.
Many of the overt harassment tactics discussed below are surfacing in cases
which (so far) have not involved discernible forms of electronic harassment.
These are cases involving so-called "whistleblowers" who, because of
their inside knowledge of certain potentially newsworthy events, pose
particular threats of embarrassment to the Government or to
government-affiliated employers. We have noticed that electronic harassment is
beginning to surface as a form of retaliation against persons who try to assist
electronic "harassees." Retaliation suggest loss of control. Under
these circumstances, we are not entirely confident that "whistleblowers"
will continue to be exempted from this type of harassment in the long term.
The individuals now in touch with the Project describe their circumstances as
involving most, if not all, of the following overt forms of harassment:
* Sudden, bizarrely-rude treatment, isolation and acts of harassment and
vandalism by formerly friendly neighbors.
* Harassing telephone calls, which continue even after the targeted individual
obtains new, unlisted telephone numbers.
* Mail interception, theft and tampering.
* Noise campaigns.
While unrelenting harassing telephone calls might be considered in this
context, other tactics are employed. Blaring horns, whistles, sirens, garbage
disposal (run concurrently in apartment settings, for excessively prolonged
periods of time), and amplified transmissions of recorded "general
racket" have been used on a recurrent basis under circumstances intended
to persuade the individual that he or she is under surveillance.
In all of these cases, the individuals' neighbors apparently pretend to be oblivious
and/or indifferent to these sudden, continuous explosions of noise.
Door slamming is also a popular pastime, particularly in apartment buildings.
One individual reported that, during a peak period of harassment, the neighbor
across the hall began entering and leaving his apartment every 10 minutes,
slamming his door loudly on each occasion. This was a daily occurrence,
encompassing periods of several hours, over a period of several months. It is
apparently served to trigger a door-slamming "chain reaction" on the
part of neighbors both on that floor and on the floors immediately above and
below. When our contact politely asked her immediate neighbor to close her door
more quietly, he slammed the door in her face. Prior to commencement of this
harassment, the neighbor had apparently been quite friendly and courteous.
In another case, the primary door-slammer is an employee of Radix Systems,
Inc., Rockville, MD, a DoD contractor engaged in the "super-secret"
research and development of some type of electronic equipment.
Several individuals reported recurrent, loud, strange noises in their
ventilation systems during the preliminary stages of their harassment. One
individual complained of being recurrently awakened in the middle of the night
by the sound of wires being fed into his (independent) ventilation system. On
checking further, he found that a tubular construction had been built into his
vent system which appears to lead to the apartment upstairs. His upstairs
neighbor is employed by the Department of Justice.
A number of individuals report that occupants of upstairs and downstairs
apartments appear to follow them from room to room, tapping on the floor or
engaging in other activities which appear intended to advertise an ongoing
surveillance.
The Justice Department employee mentioned above went as far as to offer an
unsolicited apology to her downstairs neighbor for an all- night "pacing
about" in her bedroom (in the event he had happened to notice it). She
claimed to be an insomniac. The pacing-about continued during her recent
36-hour absence from the area. When her contact politely alerted her to the
fact that her apartment had apparently been entered during her absence, she
told him, in effect, to mind his own business and then immediately complained
to the building manager that he was stalking her.
She conveniently forgot to inform the building manager that she had assiduously
"courted" this individual for several months, without success; and
that she had been stealing his newspapers on a regular basis. (On one occasion,
she handed him a week's accumulation of those papers, claiming that they had
been left outside the door of another apartment. Her reason for collecting and
saving the newspapers which had not been delivered to her directly is unknown.)
* Recurrent confrontations by unusually hostile strangers; and comments by
strangers which appear intended to evoke "paranoid" reactions.
In this context, we note that several individuals have reported confrontations
with "homeless" people who, on closer examination, were found to be
fastidiously clean, though garbed in offbeat fashion (wigs included). The same
"eccentric" confronted two of the individuals in contact with us, at
separate distant locations. He is reported as having feigned mental illness on
both occasions, and as having apparently enjoyed creating a public scene.
* Entries into the individual's residence, during late-night hours while he/she
is sleeping, and/or during the day when the individual is elsewhere.
In virtually all such cases, the burglars leave evidence of their visits, such
as relocating objects, or by committing petty and not- so=petty acts of
vandalism. In two cases, the burglar's "calling card" was to
slaughter caged pets, leaving the mangled carcasses inside their locked cages.
In one case, the burglar stole several pieces of correspondence and left a
packet of crack cocaine behind as a "calling card." Our contact in
this case -- an individual who has no criminal record and no history of
experimentation with drugs -- is also being harassed (stalked) by a police
officer of her community. One of his recent acts was to "frame" her
with a drug possession charge. After pulling her off the road (a frequent
pastime) and subjecting her to an illegal search (done, twice, so far), he
conveniently managed to find a glassine packet of cocaine eight feet away, in
front of his squad car. He retrieved the packet with his fingers and then
charged her with Possession. Our contact found the packet of crack cocaine in her
apartment shortly after this investigator reminded the attorney handling her
case that the police officer had smudged his only piece of evidence with his
own fingerprints. It would appear that someone is interested in correcting that
police officer's oversight.
In another case, the individual reports that a tremendous amount of money has
been stolen from a hiding place in her apartment, within hours after she had
withdrawn the money from her bank. There was no obvious signs of entry into her
apartment. The police conducted a cursory inquiry which failed to produce
evidence of a crime worthy of investigation. (This case is an anomaly. Money is
usually not stolen. Documents appear to be the preferred objects of theft, when
theft occur.)
In another case, the burglars replaced installed lightbulbs with
"exploding" bulbs, many of which were 'Made in Hungary.' The
lightbulbs are now in our possession.
* Rapidly deteriorating health, generally of a digestive nature.
In two cases of the cases reported, massive rectal bleeding accompanied the
sudden onset of sever gastrointestinal disturbances. One of these individuals
abruptly terminated the deteriorative process simply by changing the locks on
her door.
* Sleep disruption/deprivation
This is achieved by means of overt and electronic harassment. Sleep
deprivation, as a tactic, invariably surfaces when the targeted individual
begins exhibiting a strong emotional and irrational response to the other forms
of harassment.
* Vandalism of privately-owned vehicles
Vehicles invite peculiarly ferocious attacks in these harassment campaigns --
slashed tires, smashed windows, oil drainage, oil contamination, destruction of
electronic components and batteries
(frequently involving wildly fluctuating, grounded fuel gages, often within
range of weapons research facilities and/or other microwave emitters); and
suddenly failed brakes and clutches
(possible involving anti-traction polymers, which are also in DoD's
"non-lethal" weapons arsenal). Recurrent auto thefts have also been
reported.
Two individuals reported finding their oil contaminated immediately after
having the oil changed by reputable mechanics. In one of these cases, the oil
viscosified (thickened) while the individual was driving through a remote rural
area. Her car ground to a halt. Getting the "gunk" cleaned out of her
engine proved to be an expensive ordeal. (Viscosification agents are also
lauded by the U.S. Global Strategy Council as serving "non-lethal"
strategic purposes -- a topic discussed in Part I of this publication. Had this
woman been assaulted while awaiting help in the said isolated area, the
"non-lethal" attributes of viscosfication agents might have required
redefinition.)
Most of those who have experienced these attacks on a recurring basis have
abandoned driving all together -- an objective apparently sought by their
tormentors as a means of increasing their isolation.
* Staged accidents.
The majority of those in touch with us have reported these types of
experiences. One individual, for example, was tailgated at a high rate of speed
by two vehicles, while concurrently being threatened with a gun by one of the
vehicles' occupants. Two others narrowly avoided what happened to be
deliberately attempted collisions by drivers who quickly sped away from the
scene. One avoided three attempts in four days at being run off the road. One
survived by being run off the road in two incidents within a one-week period,
which resulted in "totaling" of her two vehicles. Another narrowly
avoided being crushed into an expressway retaining wall, on four occasions, by
an off-duty metro bus, as well as, within the same time frame, being
"fried" by two suddenly-malfunctioned household appliances which
subsequently repaired themselves. It should be noted that, in some of these
cases, "accidental" deaths do occur. One individual in contact with
us reported that his mother drove off a cliff to her death, during a period
when he was researching evidence that a still-respected, high level State Department
official had passed A-bomb secrets to the Soviet Government during World War
II. The accident occurred shortly after her car had undergone routine
maintenance. She was returning from a dental appointment when the accident
occurred. Witnesses state that it appeared that she had suddenly stepped on the
accelerator before running off the road. The accident served to terminate this
person's research project.
We also look into the recent death of a woman in Lexington, MO, who was killed
when the brakes on her tractor failed. We are informed that she had been
collecting affidavits from persons who believe they are the targets of
government harassment and experimentation when her "accident"
occurred. We are also informed that these affidavits have disappeared.
Suicides might also qualify as "staged accidents, " particularly
where "plausibly deniable" government involvement has been surfaced.
We are currently looking into the recent suicide of a man in Trappe, PA, who,
as early as 1981, had asked the FBI and CIA to intervene in his case. We have
copies of that early correspondence. The man, a former U.S. Army radar
technician, had a highly technical and -- given date of his correspondence --
"precocious" grasp of the experimental objectives apparently being
sought in his case. It is apparent from his correspondence that he had wanted
to believe that the Soviets were conducting these experiments. The FBI and CIA,
of course, did not intervene. We are informed that members of his family have
also been targets of this experimentation.
* Isolation of the individual from members of his/her family -- virtually
assured when highly focused forms of electronic harassment commence.
The exception to this is when elderly parents and young children in the family
become targets for apparent purposes of intimidation. This situation has been
reported in eight of our cases, to date.
One individual (driven to extremes of stress by ongoing electronic harassment
focusing on her children) killed one child in an effort to protect her from
further pain.(2) It appears that lasers were being used in this individual's
case. The targeting intensified after she called the Soviet Embassy to report
the harassment, which she believed to be U.S. Government-sponsored. It became
even more deadly when, in a further show of defiance, she then called the
representative of the Iraqi Government to portray the U.S. Government's war in
the Middle East as "hypocritical." She is now hospitalized in a
midwestern facility, where, apparently, the experimentation is now continuing.
(That psychiatric facility is in a State where a disproportionate number of
complaints of electronic harassment are beginning to surface. It is also within
range of a U.S. Air Force base which houses a "super secret" research
facility. We are currently looking into information that spouses and children
of persons employed on that USAF base may be the targets of involuntary
experimentation involving direct-energy weapons technologies.)
Another individual, during a telephone conversation, was told by an employee of
a local power company that, if she valued the lives of her children, she would
drop her public opposition to the company's installation of high power lines.
Since receiving that threat, the individual's 11-year-old daughter has been
reduced to extremes of pain, resulting in her recurrent hospitalization for
treatment of illnesses which cannot be diagnosed. It is also apparent to this
individual that her three-year-old son is on the receiving end of
externally-induced auditory input. (DoE figures prominently in this case.)
* Progressive financial impoverishment, brought on by termination of the
individual's employment, and compounded by expenses associated with the
harassment.
The majority of those now in contact with the Project -- educated, white-collar
professionals -- have lost their jobs. Termination of employment in many of
these cases involved prefatory harassment by the employer and co-workers, which
coincided with the other overt forms of harassment discussed above.
The overt harassment tactics are being described as recurrent, non- sequential
and overlapping. As noted above, the overt harassment continues even after the
electronic harassment commences.
FAILURE OF "ESTABLISHMENT" SUPPORT SYSTEMS Those individuals who have
tried to resolve their respective situations through resort to
"establishment" channels have invariably encountered the following:
Apathy, indifference, empathy, humor, fear, ect\images\images\img00042.gif)
\images\images\Sat1.jpg)
.